This week I learned a new term…Edupunk. Apparently I am an edupunk (or so I think). In its most vague terms, Jim Groom’s term Edupunk refers to “an approach to teaching and learning which results from a Do-It-Yourself attitude that avoids mainstream tools.” (Wikipedia) In my book, that is what Ed. Tech. advocates do on a day-to-day basis. I had called it being progressive. Others call it bucking the trend or going against the establishment.
Before discussing my own feelings toward Edupunk, I want to distinguish how I am defining the term. Teaching with progressive pedagogy refers to implementing new tools which advocate for best practices in teaching and learning. For example, a progressive, technology-infused teacher would use Edmodo to allow students to post their thoughts (as a means of formative assessment). Edupunks go a step further. Not only do Edupunks consistently tweak their lessons, read articles and implement emerging technologies to enhance their teaching and learning like progressives. They also advocate for their fellow educators to do the same. For this reason, I would call myself a blossoming edupunk.
With the recent rise in popularity of MOOC’s, PLEs and using social media in education, nobody can deny there is a movement building which advocates for progressives to turn edupunk. But it isn’t that easy…
Like any tradition, right or wrong, it’s hard to step away. Personally, in my short career in education, I have gravitated toward progressive thinkers such as Will Richardson, Sir Ken Robinson and Scott McLeod, each of whom are edupunks in their own right, consistently advocating for change in the interest of the learners.
Before going edupunk, ask yourself:
Do you feel comfortable stepping away from institutionally-supported tools (like LMS)?
I struggle with this. Though I see no point in using the archaic LMS tools like Blackboard and web portals which act as gated databases to store info, I have come to appreciate newer, hybrid models like Canvas which combines the necessary features of an LMS (grade storing, comments, document sharing) with more web 2.0 tools (wikis, blogs, etc). Of course, in essence, it is still an LMS.
I have read many articles and case studies advocating the use of blogs or ePortfolios to track and manage learning. This is exciting and I would love to try it! However, in order to be successful implementing such a progressive shift, I feel the change needs to be advocated from the top and accepted by all constituencies.
What are the implications of going edupunk for learners?
I’ve been racking my brain for three days trying to come up with negative impacts on learning when teachers or schools go edupunk. I have come up with very little. I feel that in addition to students learning the content presented, in a much more learner-friendly way, they would also learn the soft skills needed to succeed “down the road.” (Wherever the road takes them) However, until colleges and universities, parents and communities are comfortable with the new normal, it will remain a fringe (punk) concept.
Like the adventurous punk bands of the 1970s, blossoming edupunks need to band together to create a new genre for teaching and learning.
Until then, meet with fellow edupunks but attending an Edcamp near you…